False Flags – what are they? And have they ever been proven?

To that I say…
1 it is never too early to discuss who might be the perpetrators of tragic events. If there is any question that may be asked it should be asked.
And…
2 nowhere in this article will I specifically claim any recent events were a false flag, I am merely proving that false flags do exist. Once that step has been taken and those facts accepted you can discuss recent events amongst yourselves.

Do you know what the phrase False Flag means?

If your answer includes the phrase “crisis actor” you are wrong. Most false flags have real victims, the only thing false about them are the scapegoats who are lied about, and blamed as the perpetrators. Has this ever happened? Yes. It’s been both proven and admitted. So, no, it’s not a ridiculous idea and that much I can and will prove.
“false flag describes covert operations that are designed to deceive in such a way that activities appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.

Historically, the term “false flag” has its origins in naval warfare where the use of a flag other than the belligerent’s true battle flag before (but not while) engaging the enemy has long been accepted as a permissible ruse de guerre; by contrast, flying a false flag while engaging the enemy constitutes perfidy.[1]

Operations carried out during peace-time by civilian organizations, as well as covert government agencies, can (by extension) also be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organization behind an operation.. Wikipedia

It doesn’t necessarily need “crisis actors” in fact sadly they usually have real victims.

A false flag is not necessarily something that didn’t happen, it is usually something that did happen but was either blamed on the wrong people or allowed to happen. I’m not claiming people were not hurt or killed, I’m not even claiming this was a false flag yet. I’m just asking questions and giving people reasons to question the narrative.

I’m surprised how many people are already talking about it more openly than I normally would. This sort of talk invited insults and ridicule ten years ago, but now I’m often preaching to the converted.
 
🕊️
 
Before I get to the historical false flags I will address the assumption that our government may have been that brutal in the past but would never stopped so  low as to kill and lie for financial reasons. Actually the Chilcott enquiry proved politicians will bomb children over a lie. History has proved politicians will bomb children over lies. The fact that some can’t believe it is actually evidence of your denial, letting pensioners die, disabled people die, and people who can’t afford health care die is just the blunt side of a regime that doesn’t give a fuck about human life. Most of these ‘gullible sheep’ came to their conclusions based on years of research, not a quick Google. Research you’ve evidently never done or this would all sound less crazy to you. I know several historical facts less crazy than this scenario.
 
🕊️
 
In case you think the whole idea is ridiculous and no government would ever do that… (6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this). (7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this). (8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950’s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister. (9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence. (10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change. (11) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries. Read more: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/42falseflags.php#ixzz4htNadB8U
🕊️

There is a bit of a debate over whether or not Theresa May’s husband owns shares in G4S (so I am withdrawing that bit from my evidence pile but mentioning the fact that people argue about it for you to draw your own conclusions and do your own research.) But there is plenty of evidence that G4S is ‘dodgy asf’.

“Although the NYPD has denied any relation to the shooter, Mateen’s employer, G4S, has some interesting links to previous terrorist events. And it benefits from terrorism.

Mateen worked for the British company G4S since 2007. Throughout that time, G4S has been what people might call a private, special operations military outfit. It is said to be three times the size of the British military. In 2012, a G4S employee was charged with making a bomb threat at the Olympics. Similar bomb threats were connected to G4S in 2013 and May 2016.

Previously called Securicor, G4S provided security at all three airports affected by the 9/11 attacks. Securicor/G4S had bought Argenbright Security—the 9/11 airport security firm—just nine months before the 9/11 attacks. The company later ran operations at Guantanamo Bay.” From http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/06/orlando_g4s.html

 
🕊️
 
Does it matter whether the terrorists are here or there? What matters is they only win if we  get so scared we can’t love and so scared we can’t share. They don’t want you to be happy. They want you to be stressed. They want you to be scared. They don’t want you to go out, share love and live your life without being a microchipped, monitored slave to fear.
So what we gonna do? We gonna keep on loving. We gonna keep spreading the love. We gonna find solutions rather than problems.
🕊️🕉️❤️🕉️🕊️
If you mind is sufficiently open to question recent events, may I suggest you start here with an article by John Pilger… – https://off-guardian.org/2017/06/03/terror-in-britain-what-did-the-prime-minister-know/
And if you’re up for something more  a light-hearted I wrote these lyrics for Who Cares months before the recent attacks “most people just want to know ‘who can we blame’ and after that it’s back to ‘who won the game?’ The banks and politicians have been performing the greatest robbery while immigrants get blamed for the lack of jobs and the economy. Luckily I remember the words of Malcolm X warning me, ‘the media will have you thanking your oppressors and blaming the oppressed…'” Light-hearted? Well I’m dressed as Spider-man dancing like a cross between Michael Jackson and Beyonce…
Advertisements

Racism, The EU and the New World Order… The Racist Agenda of the New World Order / Illuminati / Banking Elite and Resistance to the EU without Racism…

Speculative data. This is an experiment and I honestly believe that I’ll get open and honest discussion but if it results in angrily swapping opinions as fact I’ll delete it and never do anything like it again.

Now anyone who is a facebook friend knows I like to research alternative information from alternative media. Now I have to state for the skeptics that I do not assume that alternative media is right, I just know for sure that I do not trust mainstream media. Most of you know that I have an interest in Eastern philosophy and New Age spirituality. These are the things I choose to share. Some of you may be aware that I am interested in conspiracy facts, by which I mean documented factual history that has been admitted like MK Ultra and the Tuskegee experiments and also conspiracy theories which are speculative. I do not share the theories much anymore, they have a negative effect on my credibility as well as just spread negativity and unnecesarilly pollute the collective consciousness with negative unknowns. I am also an amateur theologian, I have an interest in the true roots of Christianity, the Essenes and the true history and teachings of Christ. I do not share that much either because Christianity is seen as ‘uncool’ and most of you don’t care, it’s only an interest because I was raised a Christian and I have one foot still in that belief system for reasons too complex to explain, suffice to say I the teachings of Christ and the actions of the Church often couldn’t be further from each other.

Okay, that’s the playing field. I have two points that have been in my head for years and I can’t keep them to myself anymore.

Point number 1. One of the threads that conspiracy theories and facts will pull up is the idea that the powerful elite, the banking families, the New World Order and/or the Illuminati want a one world Government with little or no civil liberties (meaning no freedoms, no freedom of speech, freedom of movement, no freedom to say what you want or go where you want without permission). Some recent events might support that theory, ID cards that you pay for everything with scared lots of people who realised they can switch those cards off. But the thing about the One World Government thing is that it might be a reason not to be o eager to become one big European country. It may be that the only opposition to that aspect of the New World Order in this country are the xenophobic racists in UKIP and the EDL. I know there are people who are not racist who do not want to see such centralisation of power but I do not know many organisations with that perception. Discuss (politely if you can).

I don’t share that perception much because it’s a perception that is shared mainly by racists, which is ironic when you see what point number 2 will be.

I dunno, that is probably just pointless description of undefinable perceptions of things that I can’t stop thinking about that could all be sorted out if we all did less thinking or more finding inner peace and helping each other perhaps? Maybe I’m just shaking a hornets nest. I have to express myself, when I’m enlightened enough to express nothing but “everything is perfect, don’t worry about the future” I’ll let you know.

Point number 2. I really don’t understand the racist agenda. I mean really. Most of the motivations of the powerful elite, the banking families, the New World Order and/or the Illuminati I can understand even if I disagree with them – financial greed seems to be the motivation. Whether it’s oil money, or war money, or banking money, or selling the NHS money you can see clearly why and how. But there were particular incidents, like Martin Luther King, an entirely peaceful man, being on the FBIs most wanted list, or even more sinister, The Tuskegee experiments – in which strictly black pilots were experimented on with syphillis (seriously, look it up) – which seem to have no motivation other than a fear or hatred of black people. There is no monetary gain from killing black people. Now I could list a bunch of bad things that happened to black people due to the powers that be but there’s not much point. I could be accused of playing the race card in which case I may be forced to post a bunch of facts, figures, and videos I usually keep to myself (it’s true, despite the amount I share on facebook there is still a whole load that I don’t share.) But I really don’t get the racist agenda. Is it fear, or hatred, or something more esoteric than that? Maybe it’s simple, mummy was racist, daddy was racist, that’s what they learned and that’s what they’ll teach their children? Just doing the best with what they have learned? Alot of black activists say it’s because if the races mixed eventually the white gene will be wiped out. Fear of a brown planet? (For the record I am similarly confused by what appears to be the supposed ruling classes obsession with child abuse and the complete lack of financial motive there, is it ritualistic or are they just emotionally and psychologically damaged bullies of the the most extreme sort? A subject for a whole other essay and a whole other day perhaps.)

Discuss (politely if you can).

I don’t know what I am expecting. Do I just need to vent or do I really believe someone can finish a sentence that starts “the new world order hate black people because – “? Maybe I just needed to write that to realise how ridiculous ever understanding other human beings can be beyond realising that we’re all doing our best with what we know.

Personal aside, Public Enemy, a rap group I have loved since I was 4, and one of the most legendary of all time had an album called Fear of a Black Planet. They also had a song called Fight the Power. Years later, maybe a year or two ago, they lent that song to a campaign that subverted the original meaning, or transmuted the original meaning. “No, BE the Power.”

Hm… just cos I can’t stop thinking about all this does that mean I should burden other people. Ignorance is bliss, maybe I should just leave people to their bliss? Just stop thinking for short moments many times, I tend to get more of a birds eye view perception with each moment of relaxed, still, emptiness. But it’s not easy for a philosophy graduate who loves to write, sometimes the words are fighting their way out of me.

I do not know if sharing the above was a power or a weakness. Maybe it would have been more powerful to feel the anxious energy of unasked questions and rest with it. Maybe it all exists just so I could repeat those three words.

Be the power.